Our Blog


MLB Trend of the Day: High Upside Pitchers at Coors Field

At FantasyLabs, we believe that we have the best tools and data available to those who play daily fantasy sports. We also realize that these tools and data are only as beneficial as our ability to communicate their functionality and worth.

With this in mind, our Trend of the Day series features articles that walk subscribers through an important trend each weekday, created with our Trends tool. Also, shortly after you create a trend, you will be able to see it under the “My Trends” column in our Player Model tool.

MLB Trend of the Day: High Upside Pitchers at Coors Field

In yesterday’s Trend of the Day, Jay looked at batters at Coors, and specifically how the high altitude of Colorado affects fly-ball hitters. In today’s TOTD, we’re going back to Coors (since it dominates each slate) and we’re going to look at pitchers with high upside — measured by an elite K/9 rate — and see if we can perhaps find a contrarian way to deal with Coors in tournaments.

Step 1: Team Filters > Stadium > Select “Coors Field”

Step 2: Stat Filters > SO Percentile > Set “90 to 100”

bryan1

Coors, at baseline, is already highly negative to all pitchers with a general Plus/Minus of -3.21. That’s not surprising, but I did wonder if perhaps high strikeout pitchers could yield some hidden value in tournaments. After all, you can’t hit home runs if you can’t touch the ball, right?

Unfortunately, that doesn’t seem to be the case — the 15 pitchers we’ve seen in the last couple of years with elite K/9 rates coming into Coors have performed even more negatively than just the general baseline Plus/Minus, as seen by their -5.23 mark in the picture above.

Have there been any instances that a pitcher with high upside has done well at Coors? Yes, actually three of the 15 measured above were 25-plus point DraftKings outings. Unfortunately, they all belong to Clayton Kershaw, who is not in this slate at Coors, and is also just an alien.

We have one match for this trend, which is why I was initially curious, but I think you know what to do with him tonight…

bryan2

Sorry, Juan.

At FantasyLabs, we believe that we have the best tools and data available to those who play daily fantasy sports. We also realize that these tools and data are only as beneficial as our ability to communicate their functionality and worth.

With this in mind, our Trend of the Day series features articles that walk subscribers through an important trend each weekday, created with our Trends tool. Also, shortly after you create a trend, you will be able to see it under the “My Trends” column in our Player Model tool.

MLB Trend of the Day: High Upside Pitchers at Coors Field

In yesterday’s Trend of the Day, Jay looked at batters at Coors, and specifically how the high altitude of Colorado affects fly-ball hitters. In today’s TOTD, we’re going back to Coors (since it dominates each slate) and we’re going to look at pitchers with high upside — measured by an elite K/9 rate — and see if we can perhaps find a contrarian way to deal with Coors in tournaments.

Step 1: Team Filters > Stadium > Select “Coors Field”

Step 2: Stat Filters > SO Percentile > Set “90 to 100”

bryan1

Coors, at baseline, is already highly negative to all pitchers with a general Plus/Minus of -3.21. That’s not surprising, but I did wonder if perhaps high strikeout pitchers could yield some hidden value in tournaments. After all, you can’t hit home runs if you can’t touch the ball, right?

Unfortunately, that doesn’t seem to be the case — the 15 pitchers we’ve seen in the last couple of years with elite K/9 rates coming into Coors have performed even more negatively than just the general baseline Plus/Minus, as seen by their -5.23 mark in the picture above.

Have there been any instances that a pitcher with high upside has done well at Coors? Yes, actually three of the 15 measured above were 25-plus point DraftKings outings. Unfortunately, they all belong to Clayton Kershaw, who is not in this slate at Coors, and is also just an alien.

We have one match for this trend, which is why I was initially curious, but I think you know what to do with him tonight…

bryan2

Sorry, Juan.